USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS TO STRENGTHEN THE QUALITY, EFFICIENCY AND INTEGRITY OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

  • PROF. OMOREGIE, E.O. Educational Foundations and Management, Faculty of Education Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria
  • PROF. JIMOH B. Educational Foundations and Management, Faculty of Education Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria
  • OMOZUAWO, E.S. Humanities and Social Sciences, School of General Studies Auchi Polytechnic, Auchi, Edo State, Nigeria

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Educational Research, Academic Integrity, Higher Education, AI research tools, QUERI Framework

Abstract

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly becoming part of the everyday work of researchers in higher education. Its value, however, depends less on the novelty of the technology than on how carefully researchers use it. This paper examined how AI tools can support three closely related goals in educational research: improving quality, reducing avoidable time and effort, and protecting research integrity. A PRISMA-informed conceptual review was undertaken using literature and substantive sources published between 2021 and 2026. Attention was given to AI-supported literature discovery, synthesis, data analysis, academic writing, peer review, and research-integrity activities. Tools discussed include Elicit, Consensus, Scite, ResearchRabbit, Semantic Scholar, Grammarly, Paperpal, Trinka AI, and Turnitin's AI-related features. The review suggests that AI can make some research tasks faster and can widen access to scholarly information, particularly for researchers working in resource-constrained settings. At the same time, AI outputs may contain inaccurate claims, incomplete coverage, biased summaries, or fabricated references. These risks become more serious when researchers treat AI output as a substitute for reading, judgement, and methodological verification. In response, the paper proposes the QUERI framework—Quality, Use, Ethics, Rigour, and Integrity—as a practical guide for responsible AI-assisted educational research. The paper argues that Nigerian higher education institutions should move beyond either unrestricted enthusiasm or blanket rejection of AI. Instead, they should build research cultures in which AI is used transparently as an assistant, while responsibility for evidence, interpretation, and scholarly judgement remains with the researchers.

References

### References

Agadagba, L. A., & Ekwevugbe, A. O. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence technology on digital management of educational systems in Nigeria. *International Journal of Innovative Education Research, 13*(2), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15482606

Akinwalere, I., & Akinrinola, D. G. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: Evaluating AI research tool adoption among Nigerian university students. *Tanzanian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4*(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18147043

Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023). *COPE position statement: Authorship and AI tools*. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. *MIS Quarterly, 13*(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Elnaffar, S., Rashidi, F., & Abualkishik, A. Z. (2026). Teaching with AI: A systematic review of chatbots, generative tools, and tutoring systems in programming education. *International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25*(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.1.1

Iferi, E., Ofem, U. J., Olom, P. A., Awok, M. P., Okute, A. L., Okon, E. E., Ebaye, A. S., Nyiam, P., Ingwe, M. O., & Ahmed, E. D. (2026). Multi-group analysis of the impact of artificial intelligence tools on research engagement among higher education students in Nigeria. *Frontiers in Education, 11*, 1805674. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1805674

Liang, J., Stephens, J. M., & Brown, G. T. L. (2025). A systematic review of the early impact of artificial intelligence on higher education curriculum, instruction, and assessment. *Frontiers in Education, 10*, 1522841. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1522841

Long, D. Y., Wang, S., Md Rashid, S., & Lu, X. T. (2026). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of its impact on student engagement and the mediating role of teaching methods. *Frontiers in Education, 10*, 1648661. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1648661

Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. *Science and Public Policy, 39*(6), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093

Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. *Science and Engineering Ethics, 12*(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0006-y

UNESCO. (2021). *Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence*. United Nations Educational

Downloads

Published

2026-09-27