ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A CO-COUNSELLOR IN COUNSELLING SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION: EMERGING TRENDS AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Keywords:
AI, Co-Counsellor, Guidance Services, Educational Measurement and EvaluationAbstract
This paper examined the emerging role of AI as a collaborative partner in guidance services and educational measurement and evaluation within the context of the digital age. It provided conceptual clarifications of Artificial Intelligence, guidance services, educational measurement and evaluation, and AI as a co-counsellor. The paper further highlighted emerging AI applications, including machine learning, natural language processing, predictive analytics, adaptive assessment, educational data mining, and generative AI, and their implications for professional practice. Although AI offers opportunities for improving accessibility, personalization, administrative efficiency, assessment quality, and early identification of learners requiring support, its implementation raises ethical concerns relating to data privacy, algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, digital inequality, and the preservation of human empathy and professional judgment. The paper argued that AI should be regarded as an intelligent decision-support system that enhances rather than replaces the roles of counsellors and educational evaluators. It concluded that responsible AI integration requires ethical governance, continuous professional development, effective institutional policies, and sustained human oversight to ensure equitable, trustworthy, and learner-centred guidance and evaluation services.
References
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). *Standards for educational and psychological testing*. American Educational Research Association.
American School Counselor Association. (2022). *The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs* (4th ed.). ASCA.
Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (Eds.). (2020). *Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work* (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. *MIS Quarterly, 13*(3), 319–340.
European Commission. (2021). *Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act)*. Publications Office of the European Union.
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. *Harvard Data Science Review, 1*(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). *Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning*. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilizing learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. *Educational Technology Research and Development, 68*(4), 1961–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z
Kaur, D., Uslu, S., Rittichier, K. J., & Durresi, A. (2023). Trustworthy artificial intelligence: A review. *ACM Computing Surveys, 55*(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3583557
Luckin, R. (2018). *Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century*. UCL Institute of Education Press.
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). *Educational assessment of students* (8th ed.). Pearson.
OECD. (2021). *Digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with AI, blockchain and robots*. OECD Publishing.
OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). *Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management*. Harvard Business School Press.
Rogers, C. R. (1951). *Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory*. Houghton Mifflin.
Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. *Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21*(2), 95–103.
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. *WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10*(3), e1355.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). *Artificial intelligence: A modern approach* (4th ed.). Pearson.
Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), *Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work* (2nd ed.), 147–183. John Wiley & Sons.
Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. In *Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge*, 252–254. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330661
UNESCO. (2023). *Guidance for generative AI in education and research*. UNESCO.
van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W. (Eds.). (2010). *Elements of adaptive testing*. Springer.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. *Management Science, 46*(2), 186–204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. *MIS Quarterly, 27*(3), 425–478.
World Health Organization. (2022). *World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all*. World Health Organization.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 STUDIES IN EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.